How to Access Route Parameter Inside getServerSideProps
Learn why your dynamic route parameter appears as undefined in getServerSideProps and how to correctly extract it from the context object for server-side data fetching.
TL;DR#
When I ran into params is undefined or Cannot read property 'id' of undefined in getServerSideProps, I realized the cause was that I was looking for route parameters in the wrong place—context.query or req.query instead of context.params. I fixed it by destructuring params directly from the context argument and using it to fetch server-side data.
If that doesn't work, scroll to verify the fix — there are two common variants this guide also covers.
What you'll see#
TypeError: Cannot read property 'id' of undefined
at getServerSideProps (pages/posts/[id].js:12:24)I encountered this error when I tried to access context.query.id or req.query.id inside getServerSideProps, expecting the dynamic route segment (e.g., /posts/123) to appear there. The behavior was the same across development (npm run dev) and production builds, and it reproduced in both local and deployed environments. I found this confusing at first because the naming (query vs params) is counterintuitive.
Root cause#
In Next.js Pages Router, getServerSideProps receives a context object with two distinct properties for routing data: params and query. params contains only the dynamic path segments from the file-based route (e.g., [id] in pages/posts/[id].js). query contains the dynamic route segments plus any URL query string parameters (e.g., for /posts/123?page=2, context.query would be { id: '123', page: '2' }). Use context.params for route segments—it is unambiguous and the idiomatic choice. I initially reached for req.query, which doesn't exist on a raw Node.js request, causing the error.
The relevant code path is:
// pages/posts/[id].js
export async function getServerSideProps(context) {
// ⚠️ Works but not preferred: context.query includes route segments AND query string
const { id } = context.query;
// ❌ Wrong: context.req is a raw Node IncomingMessage — .query does not exist (Express addition only)
// const { id } = context.req.query;
// ✅ Correct: params holds dynamic route segments
const { id } = context.params;
// Fetch data using id...
}The context object is passed by Next.js at request time and is not the same as the req/res pair used in API routes. context.req is a raw Node.js IncomingMessage object; it has no .query property at all (.query is an Express addition, not part of Node core). context.query does exist and includes both the dynamic route segments and query string parameters—but context.params is the preferred way to access route segments because it only contains the matched path segments, with no ambiguity.
The fix#
// pages/posts/[id].js
import { createClient } from '@/lib/supabase-client';
export async function getServerSideProps(context) {
const { params } = context;
const { id } = params;
if (!id) {
return {
notFound: true,
};
}
const supabase = createClient();
const { data: post, error } = await supabase
.from('posts')
.select('*')
.eq('id', id)
.single();
if (error || !post) {
return {
notFound: true,
};
}
return {
props: {
post,
},
};
}That single change resolved the issue for me because context.params is explicitly populated by Next.js with the matched dynamic segments from the file path, and params.id is guaranteed to be a string when the route matches.
Step by step#
- Open
pages/posts/[id].js. - Locate the
getServerSidePropsfunction and find whereidis being accessed. - Replace
context.query.idorcontext.req.query.idwithcontext.params.id. - Add a guard clause (
if (!id) return { notFound: true }) to handle edge cases. - Save and restart the dev server (
npm run dev).
Verify the fix#
Run:
npm run devThen visit http://localhost:3000/posts/123 in your browser.
I saw the post with ID 123 rendered, and the terminal logged no TypeError. To confirm params was populated, I temporarily added:
console.log('context.params:', context.params);I saw:
context.params: { id: '123' }If you're still seeing the error, two common variants exist:
Variant A — Using query instead of params#
You might be mixing up query string parameters with route parameters. For example, /posts/123?draft=true has:
context.params.id === '123'context.query.draft === 'true'
If you need both, destructure both objects:
export async function getServerSideProps(context) {
const { params, query } = context;
const { id } = params;
const { draft } = query;
// Now id = '123', draft = 'true'
}Variant B — Catch-all routes ([...slug])#
For catch-all routes like pages/posts/[...slug].js, context.params.slug is an array, not a string:
// URL: /posts/a/b/c
// context.params.slug = ['a', 'b', 'c']Handle it like this:
export async function getServerSideProps(context) {
const { params } = context;
const slugArray = Array.isArray(params.slug) ? params.slug : [params.slug];
const slug = slugArray.join('/'); // 'a/b/c'
// Use slug to fetch nested data...
}Why this happens (and how to avoid it next time)#
The root invariant is: route parameters are path-based (params), query parameters are query-string-based (query). Next.js enforces this separation deliberately to avoid ambiguity between URL segments and query strings.
To prevent myself from making this mistake again, I added a TypeScript type guard and ESLint rule. In types/next.d.ts:
import { GetServerSidePropsContext } from 'next';
declare module 'next' {
interface GetServerSidePropsContext<
P = Record<string, any>,
Q = Record<string, any>
> {
params?: P;
query?: Q;
}
}Then in getServerSideProps, use generics:
export async function getServerSideProps(
context: GetServerSidePropsContext<{ id: string }>
) {
const { id } = (context.params ?? {}); // ✅ Type-safe — params is typed as optional (params?: Q), so guard against undefined
}Related#
- How to Structure Your Next.js App Router Project for Scale
- Next.js App Router Guide: From Basics to Advanced Patterns
- Deploying Next.js + Supabase to Production
- Next.js & Supabase Masterclass: reliable CI/CD Pipelines with GitHub Actions
- AI Integration for Next.js + Supabase Applications
- TypeScript in 2026: Install & Configure with Node.js 20+
By mastering the distinction between
context.paramsandcontext.query, you can avoid common pitfalls in server-side data fetching and build more reliable Next.js applications. Check out the related guides above to deepen your understanding of the framework's capabilities.
Frequently Asked Questions
One email a month — no fluff
RLS gotchas, Next.js cache debugging, and the one Supabase setting that bit me last month.
Continue Reading
Fix Module not found: Can't resolve 'encoding' in Vercel
You see "Module not found: Can't resolve 'encoding'" in your Vercel deployment logs. This guide explains why it happens with cross-fetch/node-fetch and how to fix it permanently.
Next.js Build Passed But Production Broke
A green build only proves the bundle compiled. This postmortem walks through three production-only failures: missing Vercel env vars, Edge runtime imports, and cache behavior that changed after deploy.
Next.js Middleware Not Running on Vercel: 3 Causes
Middleware that works locally can disappear in Vercel production because the matcher never matches, Edge bundles a Node-only import, or auth middleware cannot read the token. This guide gives you the diagnosis order I use before touching app code.
Browse by Topic
Find stories that matter to you.
